cm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 21 hours agoJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlimagemessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1648arrow-down118
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageJust so there's no confusionlemmy.mlcm0002@toast.ooo to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 21 hours agomessage-square75linkfedilink
minus-squaremelsaskca@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 hours agoI fool-proofed the question…“Which came first, the egg of a chicken, or the chicken?”. And you can’t say they use eggs in dinosaur shaped pasta. /s
minus-squarepinball_wizard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-28 hours agoIn that case the chicken came first, regardless of how we define “chicken”, we can reuse that definition for the first “chicken egg” it laid.
minus-squareGiveOver@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoBut how do we define a “chicken egg”? Is it an egg containing a chicken, or an egg that’s been laid by a chicken?
I fool-proofed the question…“Which came first, the egg of a chicken, or the chicken?”. And you can’t say they use eggs in dinosaur shaped pasta. /s
In that case the chicken came first, regardless of how we define “chicken”, we can reuse that definition for the first “chicken egg” it laid.
But how do we define a “chicken egg”? Is it an egg containing a chicken, or an egg that’s been laid by a chicken?