This is just an actual fact.
The website “Peta kills animals” was found to be sponsored indirectly by an animal agriculture lobby.
It’s frustrating how people just believe every bad thing about PETA without questioning who is pushing that narrative.
This is just an actual fact.
The website “Peta kills animals” was found to be sponsored indirectly by an animal agriculture lobby.
It’s frustrating how people just believe every bad thing about PETA without questioning who is pushing that narrative.
The fact that you’re responding to a joke in a very literal way is honestly pretty good.


Ahh yeah true, good point.


“Offensive” conduct must be more than merely hurtful, annoying or vexing. It must be “calculated or likely to arouse significant anger, significant resentment, outrage, disgust, or hatred in the mind of a reasonable person in all the circumstances.” Moreover, it must “be likely to have a serious effect upon the emotional well-being of an addressee.”
I dunno if that’s entirely true but maybe I’m misunderstanding this - it seems kinda open to interpretation.
Not at all. Lots of money goes into making sure the public has a negative view of animal rights groups.