

Oh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.


Oh, sorry I wasn’t trying to imply it was. Just adding to your statement.


Demonstrate a single false claim


The fact AI has yet to do anything other than increase costs, increase the time taken to ship anything (particularly code), decrease trust and socialise the cost of data centres and electricity…
I’d say it’s an all of us problem and a fucking stupid problem to have.


No, my assertion is that a government coming for your guns is not the reason it’s fascist


Fascist regimes always come for guns. Governments that come for guns are not always fascist
A implies b, but b does not imply a.


That’s not a use case for users. That’s a use case for a very specific sub group who likely weren’t using the OS at all. Not saying it’s not good they would be able to if that works for them, which I doubt.
Its still not a reason to foist it onto all of us


How many misunderstandings happen because people are bad at both writing and talking?
The answer is, a great deal.
Your answer is nonsense.
There is no real use case for the user. There are only use cases for the company.


Everything is already on a planagram. It would be trivial to do.
The rich wouldn’t flee unless the tax costs many times more than the cost of leaving. These people have invested much more in their homes than anyone else.