The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 天前Don't rely on it for anything important media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1793arrow-down116
arrow-up1777arrow-down1imageDon't rely on it for anything important media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 天前message-square97linkfedilink
minus-squarewizblizz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·7 天前Sounds more actively harmful than useful to me.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·7 天前When it works it can save time automating annoying tasks. The problem is “when it works”. It’s like having to do code reviews mid work every time the dumb machine does something.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-27 天前So it causes more harm or loss than benefit. So it’s not useful. “When it works” it creates the need for oversight because “when it doesn’t work” it creates massive liabilities.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 天前I’m not disagreeing lol. I bring it up to explain why losers are obsessed with it.
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 天前If you would say the same for stack overflow and Google, then sure. Otherwise, absolutely not.
Sounds more actively harmful than useful to me.
When it works it can save time automating annoying tasks.
The problem is “when it works”. It’s like having to do code reviews mid work every time the dumb machine does something.
So it causes more harm or loss than benefit. So it’s not useful.
“When it works” it creates the need for oversight because “when it doesn’t work” it creates massive liabilities.
I’m not disagreeing lol.
I bring it up to explain why losers are obsessed with it.
If you would say the same for stack overflow and Google, then sure.
Otherwise, absolutely not.