Seriously, 15 times is my limit on correcting an LLM.

The name in question? Rach. Google absolutely cannot pronounce it in any other way than assuming I was referring to Louise Fletcher in the diminutive.

Specifying “long a” did nothing, and now I’m past livid. If you can’t handle a common English name, why would I trust you with anything else?

This is my breaking point with LLMs. They’re fucking idiotic and can’t learn how to pronounce English words auf Englisch.

I hope the VCs also die in a fire.

  • AbelianGrape@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I believe you didn’t intend to, but you did claim it, twice. Hence why the commenter I initially replied to (in which I guessed you meant the common _nick_name) was confused.

    Then you replied to me saying “it’s literally from the bible [so it’s a common name]” implying that you disagreed with me about it being a nickname and you did really mean it as a given name.

    Hopefully that explains the confusion.

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      To me, this simply is further evidence that LLMs aren’t ready for primetime, as though this were not already established.

      • AbelianGrape@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        What does any of this have to do with LLMs?

        I mean I agree with the conclusion but the confused people here are… people. I think if you ask an LLM about the “common name Rach,” it’ll also tell you that you probably mean Rachel.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Ironically, the context provided to the LLM is I accidentally shortened her name in the newsroom as her direct report. So, yes, we are talking about a Rachel, but that was very clear in the prompt.