• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interesting, so it only throttles at that temp? That’d a bit different than how AMD handles it IIRC, which think stops boosting around 80C or so and throttles around 90C, and the max operating temp is closer to 100C.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The 7000 series had the Intel behavior of just clocking up until like 95C and staying there indefinitely

      That’s why people thought the 9000 series was disappointment - AMD went back to balancing power efficiency and performance

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not really that different, the exact temperatures are slightly higher but most intel processors will boost up to 105C, then start throttling to maintain that 105C as a maximum, and if that’s not possible they’ll halt at 110C.

      AMD does the same, just the temps are (for the one specific CPU I remember them for) 80-85C for starting dialing down the boost, 90C for throttling below the normal freq, and 95C for TjMax which either halts the system or just drops the power usage so low it doesn’t matter - I’m not about to take a heatgun to my CPU to see what it does as it wasn’t capable of hitting that on its own.

      But it shouldn’t be possible to break your CPU from over temperature, no matter what those temps are, because they should be capable of protecting themselves, even if that means dropping to 386 speeds when you are running them in the Death Valley with not cooler whatsoever.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes.

      Whether Intel fucked up by saying “oh yeah works great up to 105” if that isn’t actually true is another question, as I mentioned.