• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You shouldn’t form an opinion based on one piece of evidence. There are other details that I think adds to that conclusion, such as his conservative family (and apparently good relationship with them), apparent recent engagement with online communities (didn’t vote in 2024), attendance at schools in conservative areas, etc. He was likely conservative, and recently radicalized, so it’s more likely for him to shift to the radical right than the radical left.

    • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You say “likely” a lot for someone arguing against me for not holding a hard opinion.

      I’ve probably read more on this than you have, and posted what I felt about the available evidence, item by item, in another comment Here.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        OK, I misread your comment. You said “don’t totally believe” and I took that as “totally don’t believe.” It sounded like you were completely dismissing the possibility instead of expressing a lack of certainty.

        But yeah, I’m on the same page here of not willing to say for certainty anything about this. I think the evidence is stronger for a far right motivation than a far left motivation. I also admit I have a less scientific reason for wanting that to be true: I want Trump to eat his words.

        • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Hey fair enough. It’s hard to tell if someone’s misreading or lacks nuance. Glad to hear we’re on the same-ish page.

          I’m rooting for “disenfranchised guy who was sick of everything,” because nothing will piss off both parties more than someone they can’t fit in a box.