LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square140linkfedilinkarrow-up1555arrow-down113
arrow-up1542arrow-down1imageCan anyone confirm?piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square140linkfedilink
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down6·1 year ago“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·1 year agoYou sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·1 year agoThere’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoFunny. But that’s not how the market works.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWell given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
minus-squareNigelFrobisher@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoThis again. sight
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.
“Frantically”. Guys, stop adscribing human features to LLMs.
You sound like the people in my chemistry class who say things like “don’t describe subatomic particles as happy when they’re in low-energy states.”
There’s no financial incentive big subatomic has for pretending its particles are happy, though.
I’m sure OOP works for big AI. /s
big if true
Funny. But that’s not how the market works.
Well given the names of quarks I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that a particle could be happy. After all apparently a particle can be strange, so why not happy.
I dunno, anything less would be greenwashing their profligate power consumption.
This again. sight
It would be great to provide a context too, since neither the title of the article is exhaustive about the content.