• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I do think the EU should start with a more basic app like FluffyChat in testing but rebranded, then try to make their own app over the Matrix protocol that fits their specific communications needs and share that development publicly with open source.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The biggest problem with XMPP is what various servers and clients implement is kind of all over the place. For instance, most clients support an older version of OMEMO, but some clients support newer versions, and the different versions are incompatible.

        The other issue is some platforms (iOS in particular) have pretty shitty XMPP apps filled with bugs.

        I still generally like XMPP more than Matrix since ATM Matrix clients are also filled with bugs/laggy, Synapse (the main server implementation) is very resource heavy, and message syncing is kind of shit if the client doesn’t implement sliding sync (like FluffyChat). I personally think the UI for both XMPP and Matrix clients generally kind of suck, which isn’t great for convincing non-techy people to use them.

        • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          I mean, matrix is similar. So many official features aren’t supported by various clients, and then there are non official features that the clients do support, that aren’t supported by the official clients.

          But matrix or XMPP, that problem is easily enough avoided at the “government rollout” level by standardising on a particular client and server combination

        • apftwb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I personally think the UI for both XMPP and Matrix clients generally kind of suck, which isn’t great for convincing non-techy people to use them.

          Ding ding ding. Make a Discord/Slack clone that does screensharing and drag/drop file sharing and I won’t care if it uses XMPP or Matrix

          • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I think there have been some attempts to do so, but they’re just not good enough (and/or end up dead after a while).

      • ohnomorelemmy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        This is a case where federation is nice.

        It’s good to have an easy model for communication between members of different trusted organizations without requiring everyone to create a new account on a different server.

    • JonnyRobbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Any matrix client available for both android and ios with video conference capabilities?

      that might have sounded a bit too aggressive. My question is genuine. Family members needs.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah. Compared to Teams, Matrix is fine. It’s just far from a powerful tool built by people who actually give a shit.