• CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seems to me, for  most successful companies, it does. Can you name a few successful companies past 50, making money, that don’t have management?

    There is little to no evidence, even in academic studies, typically a pro labor progressive environment, that management is not needed beyond small projects.

      • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Okay, well you find someone competent enough to deal with the tech and get paid less than the engineers 🤣.

        The rates are the rates.

        • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I could point out that I didn’t say they should be paid less, either, but my heart isn’t in it. I hope you have a good day doing whatever that is.

          • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Then go find them at the same rate. Do it.

            You can’t, because it’s an absurdly competitive market and most engineers are happy to skip it for equal or similar pay. You get what you pay for and at the same rate you typically get someone good at management or tech not both. This people go demand 300k from later companies posting more. And they’ll get paid more than the engineers because they are harder to find.