Not sure if this is the best community to post in; please let me know if there’s a more appropriate one. AFAIK Aii@programming.dev is meant for news and articles only.
Not sure if this is the best community to post in; please let me know if there’s a more appropriate one. AFAIK Aii@programming.dev is meant for news and articles only.
Where did anyone from the Dartmouth folks identify “AI” as “anything that runs on a “neural network””?
Edit: Also, I asked two very simple questions. Your response already tells me everything I need to know.
Edit II: What fucking “game” was I playing by simply asking you to verify your claims?
Lol dude like I said, knowing who wouldn’t change what you are doing.
So, you don’t know and have no sources. You’re just making shit up. That tracks.
Again, if you could articulate how knowing the names of the people who developed this stuff is going to change anything about what you are doing here I would be happy to google a history lesson for you.
E: See it from my perspective. You are not angry because of anything that I can change, you are just angry. So how could proving anything to you change why you are angry? That’s the game you are playing. And I am here to play with you.
I’m not angry, dummy, I literally just asked you to provide proof of your claims. Nice try, though.
I thought you were angry because you were dumb, but you are dumb because you are angry. (reply to the other comment dont tree this shit lol)
So, you don’t understand any part of this conversation, do you?
I was asking specifically where they gave the outline of “anything that runs on a neural network,” which was your claim that you then pinned upon the Dartmouth group. Where did you find them referring to such as a definition of AI?
You have not clarified or outlined anything regarding that claim. You have called me stupid for asking and implied I know nothing of Turing, McCarthy, Claude Shannon, Rochester, etc…, or their works, because you’re an arrogant ass who thinks you’re the only person capable of reading or taking an interest in the history and growth of technology and computers for some reason. Then you called me an idiot because you can’t provide proof of your claims, and you’re also an asshole.
Sources, or fuck off, you god damned child.
So wait this whole time you are just mad about semantics?
JFC dude you want scientific explanations for why we used words where shut the actual fuck up lol
Yes, this is a computing science subject, you were making a large claim on a subject of computer science, you were making a computer science claim, where in the field of computer science was it stated that AI is “anything that runs on a neural network”?
Give me a quote. I don’t need a scientific article. Just give me verifiable proof of that claim. I’m not mad, buddy, just very curious and thirsty for answers.
Again, not mad, and not semantics. Where was it claimed by McCarthy or the folks that worked with him that AI is “anything running on a neural network”? That was your claim, why do you claim that? Where was that ever said by any of those folks? That was your claim, back it up or suck it up.
You are trying to get me to give you sources of the semantics of the term AI. That is literally what you are doing.
I think I realized your problem, what you need is the definition of the individual parts so you can grasp the concept “AI” semantically.
AI by definition can be really mundane and limited it doesn’t have to satisfy your idea of it you got in your head from movies and tv.
Removed by mod
No, I’m asking you to give me the source on Your given definition of AI. Catch on.