And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don’t understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I’m kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

    • Do whatever, ruleslawyering is not helpful. Is the community enjoying it? It stays. Is it detrimental? It gets removed. The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

      Is someone posting vaguely in the direction of the intent of the community? That would be good enough for me.

      Anyone trying to separate posts into increasingly niche communities (like the asinine dontdeadopeninside and nosafetysmokingfirst split on reddit) is not helping the community of posters and lurkers.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I don’t tend to think of wpt as specifically twitter posts. Maybe that’s how it started, but over time it has become a more generalized “screenshots of short text posts” type of thing in my mind. The “or similar” in the rules leaves a lot of ambiguity, but in my mind Twitter was always about short text posts, so any short text posts would fall under that “similar” umbrella. I wouldn’t object to seeing something from Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit being posted here as long as it was a text post and not super long, so it feels disingenuous to complain about a Lemmy post being here.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I havent read the rules of the comm. but ive always perceived whitepeopletwitter as a place to post text based social media screenshots.

    • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It probably shouldn’t be allowed in the future, but given that it has > 300 up-votes and is only now spurring a finer definition of the rule, I think it warrants an exception. If OP reads this, they now know to post this kinda thing in a different community in the future. But removing this particular post seems a little harsh.

      Edit: This is an awesome approach to moderation btw. People like you make lemmy great, thank you!

      • rose56@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I was searching for a community to post it, but I couldn’t find any. This one seemed closer to the idea l, a post where it says something. I also think I saw a photo from Facebook in this community, so…m Maybe we need a community about posts like these, but not twitter.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      People like this need to accept and understand that we don’t want to talk about US politics everywhere, all the time.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Fighting to remove as many posts as possible on Lemmy when we barely get any posts at all doesn’t make sense; ignore the people requesting you take a popular post down for some potential technicality.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am not sure how this changes the “the post was against the states rules which are there for a reason and the mod was the absolute most gentle about it” facts.

        Did I get the facts wrong?