• Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Ah so Bots and Ai shit needs to identify itself as well? Of course not, it’s just an excuse (save the children) to do more surveillence rather than helping anyone.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It was never about “child safety”. It always was about making users more transparent, and therefore more intimidatable and controllable.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well, yeah. That was the plan from the start. Let’s not be the “dumb fucks” who just “trust him” with personal data this time.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    No thanks, I’m good.

    He’s already made his money. He needs to just retire and quit fucking things up for everyone.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      This, really, is what gets me about billionaires. Literally any of them could have just faded into obscurity years ago, lived a life of abject luxury and never had a single worry. Or, they could have spent like 10% of their wealth on improving things for society as a whole, and everyone would have loved them for it. But no - they all had to just focus on hoarding more and more and making things worse and worse for everyone else. It’s fucking baffling to me.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Don’t forget home routers have something called parental controls.

    This would put all the power of online safety back into a parents hands and maintain all privacy online for the general public and ones children as well.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What are you talking about? You think this is some kind of game where we all have to be responsible for ourselves, and create solutions that serve everybody? Get real!

      This is Earth! Where the elite make all the rules, and those rules aren’t based on logic, or problem solving. They’re based on what will make the elite the most money!

      So you bet your ass when Mark Facebook Zuckerberg pitches an idea, he’s doing so to steal your data, and figure out how to create a problem that needs fixing, which can just so happen be fixed with privacy invasion! Yaaaay! Isn’t capitolism grand?

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The market has made clear how it feels about consumer freedom. Every consumer option is lost revenue to them.

    • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And to ensure that everyone has a router… everyone will be given a state issued router with personal identification that they must use.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Could End Anonymous Internet Access for Everyone

    Don’t come over here threatening me with a good time.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes. Give the Fart Master your social security number, and mothers maiden name.

        Which you would think wouldn’t be needed if he already has your SSN…but that part isn’t about privacy breaches. Instead, he’s just looking to find your mom and take her out on a date! Fart Master is going to be your new dad!

      • Stormy@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I get it. For some reason i see this as working towards no more running 7,000 bots and influence peddling, or blatant manipulation from governments through fake accounts running “brand management” campaigns.

        Too optimistic maybe to think a company being aware of one name running a ton of accounts and doing anything for humanity because of it for the better good, but I get it.

        Plus creeps thrive in the darkness, selling CSAM and the gross shit American leaders do. Bitcoin for killing stuff on video, like it could stop. Those guys could be identified and put in a cellar never to hurt anyone again.

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Too bad almost none of that will actually be implemented and will instead be used to target those who disagree.