• Dæmon S.@calckey.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      @SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml @memes@lemmy.world

      As I mentioned in my other reply to zerodawn, when it comes to the unusual placement of the engine at the locomotive’s tail, maybe it’s a surreal (albeit it would make some sense physically speaking) way to get a traction similar to rear-traction vehicles, so the engine would be pushing forwards, rather than pulling forwards.

      I just don’t get what human would put the smoke stack at the back

      The label inside said panel kind of answers this: autistic individuals, who think in creative and often unexpected (unexpected in the eyes of neurotypical individuals) ways. Perhaps this is why I particularly didn’t find the locomotive physics that strange: I’m myself neurodivergent, so it’s natural for me to think of the unexpected.

      • gnu@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Perhaps this is why I particularly didn’t find the locomotive physics that strange

        The reason why you didn’t think it strange is because you don’t know how one works, because there’s multiple things which don’t make sense otherwise.

        The drive wheels are not the ones at the back but the ones with the connecting rods and piston rods (the pistons provide the drive force). The rods are placed in a way which would prevent the wheels turning if connected in those positions and would typically be placed on the largest wheels of the locomotive (i.e. that big wheel should be the drive wheel if it’s going to be there).

        The smoke should be coming from the very front of the locomotive as the output from the firebox needs to run through the boiler (most of the front of the machine) in order to generate the steam needed to actually drive the locomotive. Having it come from the back makes no sense unless the whole boiler arrangement is also reversed and it isn’t.

        • Dæmon S.@calckey.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          @gnu@lemmy.zip @memes@lemmy.world

          To repeat a comment I just made, adapted to the things you mentioned in your reply:

          As I said during other replies on this nested thread, i visualized this drawing as some sort of old VW Beetle: trunk at the front of the car, relatively small engine at the rear, rear traction. That’s why, at least to me, the locomotive principles clicked in my mind.

          Having it come from the back makes no sense

          Which I particularly understood as a small engine from a rear-traction locomotive… I mean, a combustion engine doesn’t need to be big, just see how old VW Beetles work with engines quite small compared to other cars.

          But, okay, let’s say the drawing is “all wrong” or physically dubious. Why it “must be AI”? Do you people happen to have seen those Rube-Goldberg art pieces? Did Rube Goldberg use AI for his artworks?

          Last but not the least, oh my Goddess! I can’t help but quote the meme: “boy, that escalated quickly”. It’s a meme, fellows, it’s meant to be a meme! Still we’re all fighting over details of a meme! I simply asked someone why they labelled this comics “AI slop”, then it developed into me trying to explain how my neurodivergent mind is visualizing the locomotive as some kind of VW Beetle shaped as a steam locomotive…

          I should disassemble some old VW Beetle someday and make myself a locomotive quite similar to the one in the comics, just for you people to see what exactly I was visualizing when I was stubbornly explaining my perception of an Internet meme. 😅