dhruv3006@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoAmazon AIlemmy.worldimagemessage-square67linkfedilinkarrow-up1750arrow-down14
arrow-up1746arrow-down1imageAmazon AIlemmy.worlddhruv3006@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square67linkfedilink
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·13 hours agoPR size is an awful metric. The bigger the PR, the less reviewable it is.
minus-squarePoolloverNathan@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 hours agoYes, that’s what the comment said — smaller PRs are better.
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 hours agoPR size is still an awful metric. It should be within bounds but it should never be an actual metric. Treating it as a metric is an idiotic idea.
PR size is an awful metric. The bigger the PR, the less reviewable it is.
Yes, that’s what the comment said — smaller PRs are better.
PR size is still an awful metric. It should be within bounds but it should never be an actual metric. Treating it as a metric is an idiotic idea.