• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You can condemn every government if you want. You’re not actually getting anything accomplished by doing so, though, in condemning everything you’re left alone. By your response, you would have let the riots persist, I imagine? Even if people were hurt by the rioters?

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Counter-protestors. There was violent conflict between the rioters and the pro-government counter-protestors, which meant putting an end to the riots to begin with was the correct move to limit the damages and injuries.

          • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It seems the violence described in the article is at least partially in response to a cop shooting a teenager? Got something else?

              • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                12 hours ago

                This is certainly an example of abhorrently violent behavior that I will assume is unjustified (I didn’t want to watch the video, I’m not desensitized to this stuff). And to clarify, this is supposed to justify ramping up violent response to protesters? Instead of searching for and arresting perpetrators who were caught on film?

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  To clarify your point, are you saying you would have rather the government treat the symptoms after they appeared, and never address the root cause? It sounds like you’re arguing China just let the violence happen and just step in at an individual level. The riots were put down with extraordinary restraint for their scale, which is why they went on for so long, until the HK gov banned foreign funding of political parties.

                  • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Yes. You are currently advocating for “minority report”-style pre-action.

                    I’m saying it sounds like the direct violent conflict between protestors and counter protestors seems to be pretty low, not much higher than any other rate of violent crime I would guess.

                    Most of the violence to my understanding was between protestors and police, who reportedly repeatedly used unnecessary force.

                    It seems like you’re trying to justify the suppression of protest and the killing of 5 people by the government because there were 2 counter protestor deaths.

                    If this were America, and we were communists protesting capitalist rule, and the police were mistreating us and we rose up in violence, would you condemn that? Would you condemn them attacking capitalist counter protestors? I don’t think you would, right? That’s hypocrisy.