• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        This seems misleading since no timespan is given, but even assuming 100% accuracy this would only matter if we were currently adding farmland at unprecedented rates to multiple places that cannot handle having more water being used.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep, as soon as you hit enter - bam. All the water is gone. Everyone knows that! It’s why no one has actually seen any AI output yet. It’s all just forecast and predictions, because actually using it would instantly turn our world into a desert. Not even the hydrologic cycle can protect us!

      • saturn_888@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        As someone who thinks ai chatbots are pretty dumb and have limited use cases (more of a proof of concept technology) the water thing is kinda dumb. Like yes it uses a lot of water, but so does everything else. and its really not gonna matter if someone types in a few goofy little prompts