• SanctimoniousApe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I imagine since it’s not an official product of Google’s, it can’t legally be called “Android.” As such it’s something that is not Android, but is highly compatible with it since both are rooted in the AOSP.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Legally? Maybe not.

      But Col Sanders left KFC after selling a business he created with his own secret reciepe. Then after he sold it, he watched the new owners use his image to sell an inferior chicken product.

      So he started up another new chicken resteraunt using the original reciepe. Legally he couldn’t call it KFC, but that doesn’t change the fact that it was the original KFC reciepe.

      Hows that phrase go? A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet.

      Call things whatever word you want, it’s still the same thing in the end.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The point that is clearly not sinking into your wired-to-argue-for-no-reason brain, is that it gets rid of the shit that Google is fucking with. Which is what they were concerned about, not the underlying structure of the OS being offensive to them.