• Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That doesn’t really work either, that adds synthesizing to the terminology but doesn’t describe most of the behaviors they have. It’s not reasoning or simulating either.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I don’t find the problem compelling enough to warrant a solution.

        why should I care about this misunderstanding that can easily be remedied with even the most basic cursory research?

        there are countless things we do this with, rivers don’t run, they flow

        even with computers we have called processing “thinking” for ages and nobody ever cared

        cities are actually not even capable of sleep either.

        I think this is a problem that doesn’t matter at all even a little. Can you tell me why we should even try?

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            My point is that people should stop pointing this out or caring and that it’s not a real problem. As was my point in the original comment.