A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 days agoInnovationlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square122linkfedilinkarrow-up1382arrow-down124
arrow-up1358arrow-down1imageInnovationlemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 days agomessage-square122linkfedilink
minus-squarellkkjjhhggffddssaa@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 days agoThere is a “no”. It loops back to the top.
minus-squareNekoKoneko@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoHaha, oh my god, I looked everywhere and didn’t see it. Leaving my comment as-is as a lasting monument to my cluelessness.
minus-squareDoc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 days agoWhich is funny because it shows the same logic that you stated by returning to the “Is it valuable” question. So even if you missed it, you still came to the same conclusion which just goes to reinforce the legitimacy of the flowchart.
There is a “no”. It loops back to the top.
Haha, oh my god, I looked everywhere and didn’t see it. Leaving my comment as-is as a lasting monument to my cluelessness.
Which is funny because it shows the same logic that you stated by returning to the “Is it valuable” question. So even if you missed it, you still came to the same conclusion which just goes to reinforce the legitimacy of the flowchart.