So, no, you have no answer to that problem at all.
I have absolutely no interest in hearing, “Well, there are dozens of possible economic systems that could be implemented under anarchism that might answer your question.” I want to know about one economic system that does answer it. I don’t care how many there are that don’t.
You’re not talking about making a wardrobe with a hammer, you’re talking about making a perpetual motion machine with a hammer, and when I ask to see the design of that perpetual motion machine, or how it resolves the fundamental problems with making a perpetual motion machine, you’re telling me, “Well, there’s not just one design, there’s lots of designs out there so one of them probably works.”
I mean, does it really matter at the end of the day? We could argue all day about our ideological differences. When it comes to climate change odds are we already hit the point of no return. We can sort out our differences if humanity survives.
It doesn’t really matter? So then you’re not actually serious about your ideology at all.
If I’m going to ask people to risk life and limb fighting to establish a new system then I kinda think it does matter whether that system has fundamental, unanswerable flaws that can be exposed in four minute comedy sketch.
OK, and can you provide one economic model that’s consistent with anarchism that provides an actual answer to my question?
Like I said. Anarchism is not a system. Its a tool to create new systems beneath it.
https://margaretkilljoy.substack.com/p/anarchism-and-its-misunderstanders
So, no, you have no answer to that problem at all.
I have absolutely no interest in hearing, “Well, there are dozens of possible economic systems that could be implemented under anarchism that might answer your question.” I want to know about one economic system that does answer it. I don’t care how many there are that don’t.
You cant make a wardrobe out of hammers, but you can use a hammer to create a wardrobe.
You’re not talking about making a wardrobe with a hammer, you’re talking about making a perpetual motion machine with a hammer, and when I ask to see the design of that perpetual motion machine, or how it resolves the fundamental problems with making a perpetual motion machine, you’re telling me, “Well, there’s not just one design, there’s lots of designs out there so one of them probably works.”
I mean, does it really matter at the end of the day? We could argue all day about our ideological differences. When it comes to climate change odds are we already hit the point of no return. We can sort out our differences if humanity survives.
It doesn’t really matter? So then you’re not actually serious about your ideology at all.
If I’m going to ask people to risk life and limb fighting to establish a new system then I kinda think it does matter whether that system has fundamental, unanswerable flaws that can be exposed in four minute comedy sketch.