• Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Vietcong was able to defend against the raid of the Washington beatling even though they had no industry. Southern Kurdistan is maintaining their position even though they don’t produce their weapons. Zapatistas has a stronghold.

    Isn’t the most important thing that these bodies actually are able to defend their areas?

      • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Not sure if I understand you correctly. You say that all of them are importing industrial goods? That doesn’t imply that they are not anprim.

        Let me know if I misinterpret you.

          • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Does it matter which tags they associate with? As long as they are not doing industry, and living with nature, that’s all that matter.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The Viet Cong and Kurdistanis are “living with nature”? I don’t even know what that really means. It also seems to me to be against the spirit (if not the practice) of anprim to simply outsource industry.

              Like I said at first, I think it (anprim) sounds nice but only as a kind of vague ideal. Fun to think about, but I can’t take it seriously as any kind of revolutionary aspiration. And again, I don’t think any of your examples (which are worth taking seriously, btw) are anything like my understanding of anprim.