cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoFeel old yet?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1746arrow-down14
arrow-up1742arrow-down1imageFeel old yet?lemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·19 hours agoNah, I’d end up explaining why floppy discs weren’t floppy, instead, and let the younger folks explain the CDs.
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·18 hours agoThey were floppy though? At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·18 hours agoThe larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
minus-squareleftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoIf you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.
Nah, I’d end up explaining why floppy discs weren’t floppy, instead, and let the younger folks explain the CDs.
They were floppy though?
At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
By 3.5" you ofc mean:
/s
The larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
If you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.