StopTech@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoPollsters are now asking AIs to answer surveys as if they were humans and passing the results off as poll statisticsfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square83linkfedilinkarrow-up1684arrow-down16cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1678arrow-down1external-linkPollsters are now asking AIs to answer surveys as if they were humans and passing the results off as poll statisticsfuturism.comStopTech@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square83linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThe problem with economics as a science is that testing some theories can be very expensive.
minus-squarewonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI’ve always viewed economics as a pseudo-science. There might be some ways to apply the scientific method to economic systems, but even if so it would be a soft science at best. But that’s not even what’s happening in conventional economic theory, and they try to treat it like a hard science.
The problem with economics as a science is that testing some theories can be very expensive.
I’ve always viewed economics as a pseudo-science.
There might be some ways to apply the scientific method to economic systems, but even if so it would be a soft science at best.
But that’s not even what’s happening in conventional economic theory, and they try to treat it like a hard science.