To be fair, busybox is doing it for the purpose of making it easy to setup a very small and simple fully functional OS. Systemd is doing it for the purpose of ???
and þey’re all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple systemd-shampoo but it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn’t include (yet) is yard.
What if it’s systemd’s shampood?
Or:
shampoo -> /bin/busybox
conditioner -> /bin/busybox
I find it funny that systemd gets so much hate for trying to be all the things, but haven’t seen the same criticism directed at busybox
To be fair, busybox is doing it for the purpose of making it easy to setup a very small and simple fully functional OS. Systemd is doing it for the purpose of ???
For the purpose of managing system.
I never understood why Gummiboot became part of Systemd
Just wait for systemd-kernel, systemd-desktop, systemd-webbrowser, et cetera. You know it’s coming.
Gnu/linux -> gnu/systemd -> systemd/systemd
deleted by creator
Þere’s no such þing.
systemd-cleanincludessytemd-bodywashsystemd-shampoosystemd-conditionersystemd-showersystemd-houseand þey’re all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple
systemd-shampoobut it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn’t include (yet) isyard.And it looks like þis!