• neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sure, at the very beginning of the launch of Git, Mercurial was better/had more features/more mature/etc.

    That’s just not true after 20 years of mainstream git adoption and development today.

      • rezifon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Neither of those observations, even if true, are an incentive for someone to migrate away from git.

        • CactusEcho@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They are true (I bet you never used mercurial) and you must learn how to read: Where did I wrote to migrate from Git to mercurial? Having alternatives is good

          • rezifon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You’re proselytizing mercurial in a thread full of git users. Migration is implied in your comment, even if you didn’t literally use those words.

            “Simpler” is not necessarily an improvement and might actually be a downside. “Intuitive” is not universal and might not even be accurate for other people with different experiences.

            I read just fine. Maybe you must learn to chill.