Money quote:

Excel requires some skill to use (to the point where high-level Excel is a competitive sport), and AI is mostly an exercise in deskilling its users and humanity at large.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I have a conversation about what I want to do and it provides suggestions and formulas or tools I wasn’t even aware of that stopped up productivity.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          You know it’s easier, efficient and better to have a conversation with an AI rather than read an entire manual that won’t contain the thing you need right?

          You know, all the things it’s advertised to do.

          • rhabarba@feddit.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Only to find the “AI” hallucinating functions that won’t work. Or won’t do the thing you were told they do.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Most times it works. When it doesn’t, it’ll still get me 90% of a solution and I can use the manual or other means to finish it. Again a much faster and better approach. I don’t need to spend hours of my time reading manuals that barely touch on the knowledge I need just to bash keys and hope for the best. Plus it’s conversational so it engages other parts of the brain as a learning tool.

              These fucking people use a rubber duck for the same thing

              • rhabarba@feddit.orgOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                When it doesn’t, it’ll still get me 90% of a solution and I can use the manual or other means to finish it. Again a much faster and better approach.

                So you prefer a “90% solution and then read the manual” to “read the manual anyway”?

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Yes. Why would I need to read something that is 99% information that is not important to me or my problem.

                  • rhabarba@feddit.orgOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    Because you’ll learn the solution for the other problems you’ll have some day on the way.