CodyIT@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoLeft to Right Programminggraic.netexternal-linkmessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down15
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkLeft to Right Programminggraic.netCodyIT@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squareFargeol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThat sounds a lot like Functional Programming
minus-squareFishFace@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoExcept they don’t like functional primitives like map unless they’re namespaced to iterable types…
minus-squarecoherent_domain@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoComprehension is functional programming too, they arise from list monad https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/school/starting-with-haskell/basics-of-haskell/13-the-list-monad And Haskell do notation indeed reads top-down, unlike Python, but I find both quite readable.
That sounds a lot like Functional Programming
Except they don’t like functional primitives like
mapunless they’re namespaced to iterable types…Comprehension is functional programming too, they arise from list monad https://www.schoolofhaskell.com/school/starting-with-haskell/basics-of-haskell/13-the-list-monad And Haskell do notation indeed reads top-down, unlike Python, but I find both quite readable.