• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      That seems pretty obvious no? Whether or not people that shouldn’t have had access to this data have accessed it. Even if they have the data showing whether or not it happened, it still takes time to go through it because they collect insane amounts on their employees.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        WHY WOULD THEY INVESTIGATE SOMETHING THEY HAVE “NO INDICATION” HAPPENED!?

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They have no indication at this time, which means that they’re not done looking but so far haven’t found anything.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            WHY ARE THEY LOOKING!? THIS MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I FEEL LIKE I’M TAKING CRAZY PILLS

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Because the best way to find any such indications is to keep looking for them in all possible places? Yes they should have added “yet.” But investigating while attempting to reassure is standard practice in crises