• SW42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It generally means the cheapest option with the simplest possible operation that does the job well enough.

      • SW42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Same thing. It has to be barely thick enough to stop a predefined caliber weapon. And made of the cheapest possible material that still makes the armored vehicle mobile. Equipping armies is kind of expensive.

        • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          That’s compleat bullshit at least with the US army they overspend by millions and are constantly one upping every army on earth and either way a military tank is better than a civilian grade sedan.

          https://youtu.be/hFn5Mi3JlMM

          • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            they overspend by millions

            Because everyone needs their cut.

            either way a military tank is better than a civilian grade sedan.

            Because they’re two different vehicles, not two different classes of product. If you compare military grade phones to civilian phones, the civilian would be better, and probably cheaper due to not having the buzzwords attached. And I bet a tank made by a private firm for non-government entities would in fact be better and cheaper than a military tank.