• jacecomix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Pet peeve: had to check “Other” and write “None” several times but otherwise fun little survey. Results should be fun to look at.

    • gmalette@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You can also not answer questions by clicking next without an answer. I chose to understand “None” as skipping

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “No”

      – everyone using compose to orchestrate software deployments

      spoiler

      Yes it is, and there’s a age old joke about docker being used for configuration management, which doesn’t require a container system.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I said yes. Then it asks what platform you use and I clicked “Docker”.

      • rmrf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It asks this regardless of whether you say you use orchestration or not. I would say that docker compose, used as intended, is not a container orchestration platform as it provides no automated scaling or resiliency across nodes

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I also had to think, but I went for CloudPanel. Fantastic server manager software from Germany. Reverse proxy my docker containers with it. Lean. Stable. Reliable.

      Fuck cPanel or Plesk with their bullshit licenses.

      • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Why is this? I’ve never used docker before and when I set up my server a couple years ago, I installed Debian, Apache, and MariaDB and got everything set up relatively easily.

        • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The problem is when one app requires a different apache(or some other random requisite) version than the other one, docker just deals with that so I don’t have to. That’s what I like about it.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            Dependency hell is self-inflicted, but sparkle-junkie devs are complicit: it’s their fault they don’t know of long-term-support enterprise OSes and don’t use one as a primary port.

          • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I actually just had to deal with this! So, I ended up spending time troubleshooting and rewriting some .conf files for Apache.

        • madeofpendletonwool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Because with docker you don’t even have to install and setup Apache and MariaDB. You run one command and it knocks out that whole process. Not go mention the security implications of completely seperating your software.

          I can also speak from experience when I say it makes development and delivery of software soooo much easier. As a self hosted software developer I can promise you that if I created an instruction set to deploy the software I build bare metal rather than just containerizing it. No offense to fellow self hosters by any means, but if I require a multi step instruction set rather than a one liner docker command I will get more issues. Humans make mistakes, and when I can automate it out with container orchestration it absolutely makes it easier for the user.

          • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I appreciate the response! When I set out to self-host, I made the decision to install everything separately, because I heard about docker and it sounded like, “plug in code and run”. And that’s something I didn’t want, only because it was a hobby and I wanted to learn more from a hands on experience. I learned a ton, sorting through those errors! If I did it over again, I’d probably use docker, based on your explanation, but I feel like that is an endeavor, in and of itself.

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      For me it’s Bitwarden, hosting their stack in 2018 right after getting my first job launched me into everything else.

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ah, but it’s how old you feel which is more important 😉

      Maybe those statistics could be really interesting:

      • How old do you feel when using proprietary software?
      • How old do you feel when using FOSS?
  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Definitely going to fill this out once I get some free time. What will the data be used for?