• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I think anyone running Open AI would make that call.

    Anyone in that role would be worried about Musk using end users as a way to acquire model distillation data to feed Grok with GTP.

    Musk is a direct competitor, has been feuding with Open AI for years, and he has shown that he’s totally ok with acquiring data in aggressively shady ways.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yup, but not everybody in charge of OpenAI would have a pissy self indulgent blog post about it produced under the company brand.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That blog post struck me as something pretty boring. It has the stink of a legal and PR team. What was the pissy / self-indulgent part?

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s all unnecessary. Cold have just said “we’re exercising our option” without all the ethical criticism.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            IMHO, if you have that many enterprise clients, you can’t just nuke product support without a press release that explains the rationale. It’s safer to explain the reasoning and as the last few sentences indicated, help them transition to a new IDE that works with your product.