GrapheneOS (@GrapheneOS@grapheneos.social)
grapheneos.social
@bekkaboo@girlcock.club Linux itself is heavily using AI models. Therefore, every Linux distribution moving to recent kernel versions is heavily built on top of using AI models. Creating a Linux distribution not heavily using it would require a hard fork of the Linux kernel and many other projects. It's unclear what would be accomplished by banning AI for a tiny portion of the code while continuing to use Linux, AOSP, Chromium and hundreds of other projects heavily using it. We'd still be benefiting from it.

GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zipEnglish
    3213·
    2 天前

    AI is not evil. It doesn’t have a consciousness. It doesn’t make decisions.

    What is evil, are billionaire capitalists having full control over the technology.

    What is evil, is the concept of closed-source.

    What is evil, is stealing all creative works without attribution or compensation.

    What is evil, is seizing essentially all the silicon to build these datacenters, then soak up all the electricity out of the grid and all the water out of the ground.

    The problem isn’t the AI, itself. It’s the means that’s the problem…not the ends.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      17 小时前

      “Evil” is a subjective term, so it is difficult to make headway in discourse using terms like that. I feel that using objective statements are more effective. Someone that thinks AI is “evil” would do better to say something like “I believe this technology to be a net harm to human society.” While difficult to verify and quantify, that statement at least still is verifiable and quantifiable, unlike “AI is evil”.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      259·
      2 天前

      To summarize: something that is being created through highly destructive amd predatory means, by completely deranged people, is not evil.

      I can’t disagree more. And to quote myself, again, today:

      As it exists, as it was created, “AI” is evil. It consumes resources we can’t afford to waste and is currently supercharging our pollution indexes and creating what may be a catastrophic collapse of already very fragile and unbalanced social and economic realities. And because we are already into the sunken cost falacy fase, it will never be rewritten or rebuilt. Hopefully, it will collapse in such horrifying way it will create a cautionary tale, but we are not so lucky, so what we are left with is picking up the bits after it. This kind of system had to be developed inside laboratories, colleges, universities, research centers, to aid into very niche and specific fields of research, not made to be a mass consumption comodity as it is. But it was, unfortunately, not done that way.