• Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Unironically Claude (or whatever you use) will almost always deliver code that is shit, it’s just less shit if you prompt it better, LLMs are good to make short snippets if you get stuck tho; And remember to fucking check what the code is and rewrite bad shit

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’ve seen plenty of code in my life, from humans and AI.

          For the past year or so, these agents can code just fine most of the time, as long as they are given enough context (or have the tools to get it). Regardless of how many downvotes I get here, they really are capable of generating decent code. I’m sorry you couldn’t make it work yet.

          • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            I’ve seen too as I have to review it. AI produces very professionally looking bad code.

            It is so weird to explain, but that’s basically what I see.

            Before LLM I could immediately tell someone’s code is crap, now I have to spend a lot of time trying to understand what it does to reach the same conclusion.

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            But AI bad and human code is so awesome! Better downvote. But seriously, there are people here saying that LLMs can not add anything of value in any way. About as delusional as Republicans.