Take that, red bull bonces!!!

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Just because something is a cause of diabetes doesn’t mean it’s the only one.

    It’s a fine line to walk, reassuring those that didn’t cause their issue (and particularly ‘easier’ for type 1 diabetes, where lifestyle choices don’t factor in), but then you may also encourage people that can avoid type 2 diabetes to think “I’m golden, sugar doesn’t cause type 2 diabetes, let me drink a sugar drink 4 or 5 times a day”.

    • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The problem here is throwing around medical terms as non-medical people. “Cause” has an exact definition in medical terms: the specific agent, event, genetic mutation, or underlying mechanism that is directly responsible for initiating a disease, condition, or pathological process. By that definition, the medical definition, sugar intake does not cause diabetes. I get that it’s a shit post and funny to make jokes about from a non-technical point, FFS I led by saying I understand it’s just a pet peeve that the terms are used interchangeably, but the fact so many people are so diehard about insisting that in some definition of cause or factor or “leads to” bullshit sugar can cause diabetes is exactly the source of my frustration.