Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1626arrow-down18
arrow-up1618arrow-down1imageI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldPope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 day agoIf I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
minus-squareddplf@szmer.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoI’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
minus-squarePope-King Joe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
If I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
I’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
I’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.
I’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
But that’s less obvious I think