• freagle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You are far too credulous. First strikes are some of the most deeply and throughly planned operations in a campaign. They knew exactly which apartments to go after, but we think they used a.i.?

    Also, bombing schools is something the US has down in nearly every single campaign in the last 20 years and those were planned without a.i. So now we’re supposed to believe they used a totally different planning technique and got the exact same result? And then double tapped it?

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think you may have too high expectations about the motivation and work ethics of the average office worker. Just because they’re job is too decide who to kill does not mean they are extra careful about that. Killing is part of the job after all.

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Average office workers aren’t involved in planning military first strikes in some of the most consequential campaigns in history. You’re stretching incredibly to try to paint the easily recognizable pattern of deliberate US war crimes as unwitting incompetence and it’s pretty gross