• village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No, it still doesn’t tip.

    A computer can’t get intoxicated, tired, or distracted. Humans can’t monitor dozens of sensors millions of times a second.

    There are definitely still steps that need to be made to advance the technology, but it already has us beat. And it’s great. Traffic related deaths are a huge issue.

    What’s not great is who owns the cars.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Human drivers: people die due to reckless driving and human mistakes - and in most situations a good driver can anticipate a lot of dangers and avoid them. ML “assistants” getting control over cars: people die of unpredictable mis-assessments of inputs vs. outputs, and there’s no way to anticipate any danger or try to avoid it.

      People who advocate for non-deterministic systems taking control in cars are irresponsible and have blood on their hands.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Your description of a human driver is no different than a self driving vehicle.

        An input/output error is the equivalent to a human mistake. And those happen far less often than a human mistake. People make unpredictable stupid mistakes driving all the time.