• undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Never having owned a CRT television (LCD was king when I became an adult) I have to say that that looks fucking sick. I don’t think I’ve ever wanted a bulky one until now.

      • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Retro games look better on them and there’s no emulator that has ever pulled off a sufficiently convincing simulation for me. They also render dark colors better than most high end TVs. If you play a lot of old games, it would be neat to have a small one. The big ones, however, weigh a metric ton and are at least as deep as they are wide, and they’re extremely front-heavy. Those aren’t worth it unless you plan to build an entire arcade cabinet around it.

        • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          True. This one is a 10" model and it already weighs a fuck-ton, and it’s quite deep and takes up a lot of space. But I really like how old games (especially PS1 and PS2) look on it.

          I wouldn’t go higher than 14" models because of the weight.

          • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Non-Sony models aren’t too heavy, especially 27" and below. My 27" CRT is more than managable for me to lift up by myself over my head.

            Sony included thick steel magnetic shielding around their tubes, making them significantly heavier compared to other brands.