LN2 is about 500kJ per kg to liquefy, that’s less than 0.01$ per kg, I don’t know where you get your milk but I want some I that price. You do know that our atmostphere is 80% nitrogen ?
The size of the dewars isn’t the relevant factor, what good is a dewar of LN2 when it’s the cryocaskets that need to be cooled, not dewars, you only need dewars to store LN2, but why would you store it in gigantic reservoirs when it can easy be produced on demand and on site ?
1nm scanning volumetric precision isn’t really far fetch at the current rate of progress, like I said, cell wall damage isn’t going to be a problem, first there’s supposed to be very little of it because, you haven’t mentioned it but, of course they’ve been using cryoprotectants from a long time now but even if they weren’t, those scanned cells aren’t going to need to work, they’re just the machinery that produces the structure, before the first person is scanned they will have algorithm to repair any damage to any cell.
What actually matter is the connections between cells, the person itself lives in the network of neurons of the nervous system and the most critical thing that actually needs scanning is the structure inside synapses, everything else is much bigger.
“moore’s law hit a wall”, doesn’t matter, easilly parrallelizable as a simulation, the hard part was scanning
“it’ll remain so for considerable time” pure speculation, but it does touch on the most probable downfall of this project and that is the very likely planetary scale collapse of human civilization from economic failure cascade.
(humans will have more pressing issues to deal with) I assure you, humans dying today do not have more pressing issues than their own death
“copy is not original” that’s a “you” problem, as I mention in my text regarding the Ship of Theseus problem
“don’t want to admit that they made a religion out of misinterpreted scifi” you could paint whole building in one swipe with a brush that wide
“not even single one frozen today will remain so” based on 1960 to 1973 ? How old are you again ?
LN2 is about 500kJ per kg to liquefy, that’s less than 0.01$ per kg, I don’t know where you get your milk but I want some I that price. You do know that our atmostphere is 80% nitrogen ?
The size of the dewars isn’t the relevant factor, what good is a dewar of LN2 when it’s the cryocaskets that need to be cooled, not dewars, you only need dewars to store LN2, but why would you store it in gigantic reservoirs when it can easy be produced on demand and on site ?
1nm scanning volumetric precision isn’t really far fetch at the current rate of progress, like I said, cell wall damage isn’t going to be a problem, first there’s supposed to be very little of it because, you haven’t mentioned it but, of course they’ve been using cryoprotectants from a long time now but even if they weren’t, those scanned cells aren’t going to need to work, they’re just the machinery that produces the structure, before the first person is scanned they will have algorithm to repair any damage to any cell.
What actually matter is the connections between cells, the person itself lives in the network of neurons of the nervous system and the most critical thing that actually needs scanning is the structure inside synapses, everything else is much bigger.
“moore’s law hit a wall”, doesn’t matter, easilly parrallelizable as a simulation, the hard part was scanning
“it’ll remain so for considerable time” pure speculation, but it does touch on the most probable downfall of this project and that is the very likely planetary scale collapse of human civilization from economic failure cascade.
(humans will have more pressing issues to deal with) I assure you, humans dying today do not have more pressing issues than their own death
“copy is not original” that’s a “you” problem, as I mention in my text regarding the Ship of Theseus problem
“don’t want to admit that they made a religion out of misinterpreted scifi” you could paint whole building in one swipe with a brush that wide
“not even single one frozen today will remain so” based on 1960 to 1973 ? How old are you again ?