Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 18 hours agoHad me in the first partmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1717arrow-down118
arrow-up1699arrow-down1imageHad me in the first partmedia.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squaredouglasg14b@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·5 hours agoIf it’s adding that many lines, it’s not refactoring. It’s just adding slop.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 hours agoThe best refactors always remove more lines than they add. This is a horrifying ratio if no new features were included.
minus-squaremcv@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoYeah, adding that many lines does not sound like a cleanup to me. Unless it’s mostly adding unit tests.
If it’s adding that many lines, it’s not refactoring. It’s just adding slop.
The best refactors always remove more lines than they add. This is a horrifying ratio if no new features were included.
Yeah, adding that many lines does not sound like a cleanup to me. Unless it’s mostly adding unit tests.