• blibla@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 hours ago

      hey now!

      4 is just as random as 29833638292F9373638292926262141414331252526283994040218 is

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        For one value, yes…. But for 8 different keys having stupidly low numbers? They either had a seriously faulty RNG, or more likely were hand creating the keys.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          And the only reason to make a key that short is if you were trying to give them to someone who shouldn’t have them, and needed to avoid any sort of digital trail, even copy and paste… so you would obviously just memorize them.

          Memorizing a bunch of 384 bit keys is basically impossible… But memorizing a couple dozen numbers? Child’s play.

            • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Considering keys like this are usually copied and pasted anywhere they might need to be manually entered… There is zero reason to make them small enough to be human-readable, unless that’s your actual intended use.

                • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Anyone in a position where they are responsible for generating a root key for a certificate authority, 100% knows how to generate a key in their sleep.

                  The only explanation is that it was made easy intentionally, not lazily.