inari@piefed.zip to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agoBuy bitcoin, bromedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square105linkfedilinkarrow-up1483arrow-down126
arrow-up1457arrow-down1imageBuy bitcoin, bromedia.piefed.zipinari@piefed.zip to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square105linkfedilink
minus-squareimeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down12·edit-29 hours ago“You’re literally 250 years behind the curve set by The Wealth of Nations…” You’re then if I am, since you’re repeating my point. As for the rest of your crap, you’re conflating and reducing several comments from several people and misunderstanding mine as a result.
minus-squareCrimeIsLegalNow@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up11·9 hours agoThat you don’t like the assumptions behind your own words when they’re pointed out doesn’t stop them from existing, and that comment is pretty rich considering the context.
minus-squareimeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·edit-28 hours agoYou’re debating your own assumptions rather than directly addressing my comments or clarifying what you don’t understand. You’re going to find it very easy to argue against things you made up, but that won’t make your presumption relevant.
“You’re literally 250 years behind the curve set by The Wealth of Nations…”
You’re then if I am, since you’re repeating my point.
As for the rest of your crap, you’re conflating and reducing several comments from several people and misunderstanding mine as a result.
That you don’t like the assumptions behind your own words when they’re pointed out doesn’t stop them from existing, and that comment is pretty rich considering the context.
You’re debating your own assumptions rather than directly addressing my comments or clarifying what you don’t understand.
You’re going to find it very easy to argue against things you made up, but that won’t make your presumption relevant.