rose56@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoIt's a wild life out there lads!lemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square303linkfedilinkarrow-up1566arrow-down189
arrow-up1477arrow-down1external-linkIt's a wild life out there lads!lemmy.ziprose56@lemmy.zip to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square303linkfedilink
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 hours agoWhat in tarnation So, no acknowledgement of anything in their message that might be agreeable or correct? I replied to them to call out some ignorant remarks they made. They started talking about something else. Why would I continue the conversation? Just a denial of a tangential assumption, as if your “French nationality” were the core of that comment. I was correcting another incorrect remark. I don’t think they read what I wrote if they think I am french. Was a pretty cogent request and the final of only 2 “paragraphs”, so confused on how you might have misplaced it. Why am I expected to respond to this person’s request?
What in tarnation
I replied to them to call out some ignorant remarks they made. They started talking about something else. Why would I continue the conversation?
I was correcting another incorrect remark. I don’t think they read what I wrote if they think I am french.
Why am I expected to respond to this person’s request?