• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well. The real problem is that there’s no way to definitively detect AI. And slop scammers are certainly not going to volunteer that information.

    • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Slopping asset flip and cash grab games have always been a problem. That’s nothing new. AI just made it easier to do.

      This is a problem that’s existed for 20 years basically. AI has only just made it more of a problem. It’s not new.

      If we could have solved this problem we already would have.

      AI disclosure at a minimum I agree with wholeheartedly.

      But basically every other solution everyone is throwing around is more or less just f****** stupid. Someone who legitimately makes a game for themselves. That is actually fun because they made it for the purpose of them themselves playing it. Even if they used nothing but AI is still probably going to be a better game than some half-assed cash grab or asset flip made by a legitimate human with no AI.

      The problem isn’t AI. The problem is s***** people making s***** games with no integrity or intent to play their own creation.

      If you want a fun game, you have to make a game you would play. How you enforce that is f****** beyond me though.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think a lot of them will in fact volunteer that information, and there is definitely a definitive way to detect AI: ask the developers to show their work. Images have layers, 3D assets can be demonstrated. Code is only slightly more ambiguous. On top of all of that, there is an obvious quality difference.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I remember a thread on here a month ago or something where the developers just asked the A.I. to generate some convincing looking work to show. Like layers and stuff as you say. It was truly shameless

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Was that the Agent Pond game with the cybercows? Not convincing at all, and also not a work file like psd, xcf, or clip, but yeah they tried.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think a lot of them will in fact volunteer that information

        LOOOOOLOLOL

        ask the developers to show their work

        Nothing about that is definitive. And Valve isn’t going to review it anyway.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sloppers think it’s the future, most of them have no idea how hated they are. Their shitbots tell them “AI assisted tools allow you to do more, better, faster” and not “yeah boss everyone will hate everything we make”.

          How is asking them to prove they did or can do work that they didn’t and couldn’t do not definitive proof?

        • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nobody is doing schoolwork to sell a game. What an asinine take. Valve also isnt going to pay people to go through all that code.