• ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    our management didn’t force it on us, we requested it

    maybe this is the difference

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      When employees ask for AI, they’re solving problems they actually understand. When management pushes it from above without training or clear goals, they’re often just chasing a productivity headline.

      • mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I would agree with this nuance. As a software developer who is now heavily using LLMs for my job, I’ve wondered about how different people see LLMs and come to a similar conclusion.

        I like them because it’s a low-level tool I reach for whereas many people forced to use “AI” are using crappy solutions hacked into their existing tools, à la Microsoft Copilot.

        AI/LLMs can be a very useful tool, but when it’s just slapped onto existing products you use, it’s often limited or only supports very contrived use cases.

        I’d hate AI too, if my only/main exposure to it was Microsoft copilot, or even Gemini in Google Drive/Docs.