Depends on the definition given. I’m not devolving into arguing about linguistics. If you didn’t understand what i was trying to say, then feel free to ask and I’ll clarify. If you did understand and are just being pedantic, while switching the topic of conversation, then it’s just rude.
Most anarchist movements agree on the statelessness of anarchist society. If you’re discussing “anarchist state”, you might have to lower your expectations of people taking you seriously. If you have not expressed your argument clearly enough, I look forward to clarification and correction of your precious comment.
By “state” I don’t mean a governing body, because duh, it won’t be anarchism. What i mean is a separate geopolitical entity with anarchism mandated as its regime by the overwhelming majority of its denizens.
Stateless anarchism won’t get us any much further than it already did
“anarchist state” is a self contradiction
Depends on the definition given. I’m not devolving into arguing about linguistics. If you didn’t understand what i was trying to say, then feel free to ask and I’ll clarify. If you did understand and are just being pedantic, while switching the topic of conversation, then it’s just rude.
Most anarchist movements agree on the statelessness of anarchist society. If you’re discussing “anarchist state”, you might have to lower your expectations of people taking you seriously. If you have not expressed your argument clearly enough, I look forward to clarification and correction of your precious comment.
By “state” I don’t mean a governing body, because duh, it won’t be anarchism. What i mean is a separate geopolitical entity with anarchism mandated as its regime by the overwhelming majority of its denizens.
Stateless anarchism won’t get us any much further than it already did