Original post: https://bsky.app/profile/ssg.dev/post/3lmuz3nr62k26

Email from Bluesky in the screenshot:

Hi there,

We are writing to inform you that we have received a formal request from a legal authority in Turkey regarding the removal of your account associated with the following handle (@carekavga.bsky.social) on Bluesky.

The legal authority has claimed that this content violates local laws in Turkey. As a result, we are required to review the request in accordance with local regulations and Bluesky’s policies.

Following a thorough review, we have determined that the content in question violates local laws in Turkey, as outlined in the legal request. In compliance with these legal provisions, we have restricted access to your account for users.

  • Ravenfreak@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m not even surprised lol. Just another reason why communities like Lemmy and forums are better than any social media platform. Man I hope the Fediverse keeps growing, the more people that see through this bs and jump ship and find us over here in the Fediverse the better.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Remove one Turk from the service or remove the entire service from Turkey?

      Essentially the question Bluesky executives had to make here.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Assuming you are serious:

      Bluesky is … arguably ‘federated’, but it is centralized, not decentralized.

      https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20241128-bluesky-decentralization

      Their model (AT Protocol) relies on a central, authoritative … ‘Relay’, that all ‘federated’ users and posts on federated PDS (personal data servers) must go through, to actually reach the ‘AppView’, ie, what all other people/users can actually see.

      So, this is not a many to many, tangled spider web of connections, the way lemmy, and other parts of the actual fediverse are.

      It is a top down hierarchy, a pyramid.

      And Bluesky runs the Relay, the chokepoint.

      If Bluesky cuts off the PDS your account is on, everyone on it is now gone.

      The actual fediverse, Mastadon, Lemmy, etc, runs on ActivityPub.

      In that model… every instance is essentially self contained, and every instance that is federated communicates with every other instance that is federated.

      Each instance can decide what other instances they want to federate with… and users on each instance can personally block even more other users, communities, or entire instances if they choose to, but that only effects what that particular user sees.

      That is what you call decentralized, approaching, or also having elements of being ‘distributed’.

      To bring up an example without getting into the drama that led to it:

      The ‘Tankie Triad’ of ml, lemmygrad and hexbear have had a number of other instances defederate from them.

      But, there are also a good number of instances that have not done so.

      So that means if your account is on hexbear… you can’t see or post on an instamce that has blocked your instance.

      But, if you (a hexbear…ian?), post on a neutral instance… users on that neutral instance will see the post.

      But but, if a user from an instance that has defederated from hexbear goes to to the neutral instance… they will not see the hexbearian’s post.

      This sounds complicated, and it is, but … thats the whole point of a decentralized system. It is more complex in the abstract… but the entire system ends up being more robust, more adaptable, more customizable… without a central authority in direct control of the entire system.

    • SlothMama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly at this point I want to host a distributed Lemmy instance and completely ignore all country laws in favor of complete and absolute freedom of speech.

      It might sound extreme, but pretty sure at this point I’d be willing to die for it given the state of global politics.

        • SlothMama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Who the fuck said anything about porn of any kind? People always use protecting kids as a way to censor the Internet and it’s almost always in bad faith.

          • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You did.

            completely ignore all country laws in favor of complete and absolute freedom of speech.

            If you didn’t realize what you said, hopefully you’ll rethink your goals to include the obvious end results. I suppose you could disallow images of you’re not serious about “complete freedom”, then you just have NeoNazis instead of pedophiles.

            • SlothMama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Your comment is so mired in ignorance, to think you would oppose free speech over how it would be abused and ignore the net positive is exactly how we’re losing freedoms each and every day.

              People like you are ruining the world while telling people you’re fixing it.

              • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                When someone says they want to create a haven for NeoNazis and pedophiles, I just want to check in and see if they’ve thought things through. It’s hilarious how you’re calling me names for pointing out the obious problem instead of trying to come up with any way to mitigate the harm.

                I don’t think you’ll be doing enough good to make a net positive from your child pornography and Nazi haven. Have fun though.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Where is bluesky based? As far as I know you have to follow the laws of where you are based. Otherwisse we’d have to follow the lowest common denominator, like north korea, or afghanistan or the like

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        it doesn’t matter where you’re based; if you’re operating in a country, you follow the laws of that country.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or you play a cat-and-mouse game with the authorities in that country as they try to block access to your servers. Depending on your moral values this might be preferable to blindly following the laws of authoritarian regimes.

          It’s really the country you’re based in that matters the most.