If I had to choose between explaining how 2 women have a baby and explaining what “pimpin’ a ho” and “187 on an undercover cop” means, I know what I’d prefer.
i’m reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it’s not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it’s about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it’s not “a person”, it’s specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
And thats problematic in just… So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you’re accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn’t transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
Conservatives THINK there’s something wrong with that shit though. He’s acting like someone who thinks there’s something wrong with that shit, while still trying to cash in on that image
And im saying we shouldnt validate that. Fuck them, they’re wrong about basically everuthing, including being conservative.
Like the greek classics statuewank guys who dont want to see the original pain jobs or all the gay sex people had in front of them.
Like, if they can’t compromise, cant consider us human, why pretend, why try to compromise with them? Just tell them its whatever compromise the left comes up with by ourselves, or the highway. I bet it would even work better politically.
it’s not condemnation, it’s pointing out hypocrisy.
If I had to choose between explaining how 2 women have a baby and explaining what “pimpin’ a ho” and “187 on an undercover cop” means, I know what I’d prefer.
I don’t know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don’t think it’s that broad.
Okay but nobody said that. They said ‘how dare somebody who likes drugs and has done sex work hate someobe marginalized!’
i’m reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it’s not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it’s about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it’s not “a person”, it’s specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
And thats problematic in just… So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you’re accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn’t transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
But there’s nothing wrong with fucking or doing drigs, and the perspn ‘pointing out hypocrisy’ didn’t mention that hes a rapist
Conservatives THINK there’s something wrong with that shit though. He’s acting like someone who thinks there’s something wrong with that shit, while still trying to cash in on that image
And im saying we shouldnt validate that. Fuck them, they’re wrong about basically everuthing, including being conservative.
Like the greek classics statuewank guys who dont want to see the original pain jobs or all the gay sex people had in front of them.
Like, if they can’t compromise, cant consider us human, why pretend, why try to compromise with them? Just tell them its whatever compromise the left comes up with by ourselves, or the highway. I bet it would even work better politically.