defunct_punk@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-23 months agoAnon is a stoiclemmy.worldimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1536arrow-down19
arrow-up1527arrow-down1imageAnon is a stoiclemmy.worlddefunct_punk@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square34linkfedilink
minus-squaredefunct_punk@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-23 months ago… is it not “neet-s’chay”?
minus-squareContriteErudite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 months agoNope, it’s nee-chuh. I also mispronounced it for years…
minus-squareXanthrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoI’ve never seen Marx and Nietzsche in the same room…
minus-squareSchmuppes@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 months agoClose, but the second syllable is different. You’re correct that its not a silent vowel, it’s pronounced exactly like the short version of the article “a”, or the first letter of the word “announcement”.
minus-squareSpongeBorgCubePants@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoIf only there existed a phonetic alphabet that would make such discussions unambiguous smh
… is it not “neet-s’chay”?
Nope, it’s nee-chuh. I also mispronounced it for years…
Njet-ze komrad
I’ve never seen Marx and Nietzsche in the same room…
Close, but the second syllable is different. You’re correct that its not a silent vowel, it’s pronounced exactly like the short version of the article “a”, or the first letter of the word “announcement”.
Neat sha(mbles)
No.
If only there existed a phonetic alphabet that would make such discussions unambiguous smh